VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2010 › High Court of Delhi

Harmeet Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 October 2010
Bench
A.K. Pathakauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1534/2010

Judgment

-a 2sf JI o/o. 01.10.2010 Present: Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Ms. Prachi Sharma, Mr. Kushagra Arora and SI Vijay Kumar. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. R. Gogoi, Mr. Gainilung Panme & Mr. B. Chaudhary, Advs. for respondent No. 2 with respondent No. 2 in person. +Crl. M.A. No. 15964/2010 (exemptionl * Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Apphcation stands disposed of. W.P. (Crl.l No. 1534/2010 On the complaint of respondent No. 2, FIR was registered against the petitioners. Dispute was with regard to a flat bearing No. E-83, Ground Floor, East of Kailash, New Delhi. It was alleged in the FIR that despite receiving payment possession of the flat was not handed over to the complainant/respondent No. 2. Now, petitioners and respondent No. 2 have settled their disputes amicably. Terms of settlement have been recorded in memorandum of settlement dated 14th January, 2OIO; photocopy whereof has been Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. i>-; \- placed on record. Respondent No. 2, wjao is present in the Court today, has no objection if tJle FIR is quashed. In view of the setflement arrived at between the parties and in the larger interest, I quash the FIR No. 574/2oo9 under Section 420 IPC registered at police station Amar Colony and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. However, cost of T 10,000/- be deposited by each of the petitioners with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within three weeks and receipt thereof be filed with the Registry. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

A.K. PATHAK, J. October 01,2O1O rb

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.