Varun Dhameja &Ors v. State & Anr

ORDER %

24.10.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks for quashing of FIR No. 697/2006 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at PS Patel Nagar, Delhi. Ms. Neena Mahindru, mother and power of attorney of Ms. Ratna Mahindruis presentin court. Copy ofthepowerof attorneyhasbeenplaced on record and it is stated that the originalpower of attorney has been placed before the learned Trial Court in HMA No. 520/2011 before the Court of Sunil Rana, Additional District Judge-Ill, Rohini West. She states that the matter between Ms. Ratna Mahindru and the Petitioners has been settled. In terms of the settlement, marriage between Ms. Ratna Mahindru/Respondent CRL.M.C.3550/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. No. 2 and Mr. Varun Dhameja/PetitionerNo. 1 has been dissolvedby a decreeofdivorceby mutualconsent. As full and final settlementofall the claims of the RespondentNo. 2, the PetitionerNo. 1has to pay ^10 lakhs out of which ^8.5 laldis have alreadybeen paid to her and ^1.5 lakhs have been paid to her today in court vide DemandDraftNo. 636237 dated 24^^ September,2011 drawn on CorporationBanlc,Noida. PowerofAttorneyof RespondentNo. 2 further statesthat in view of the settlementbetweenthe parties,RespondentNo. 2does not want to pursuethe abovementionedFIR andthe proceedingspursuantthereto. The Petitionerswho are presentinCourtstatethatthey do not have in theirpossessionany ofthe educationalcertificatesofthe RespondentNo. 2. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differencesof their own free will, volitionand withoutany coercionand no useful purposewill be served in continuanceofthe proceedings,ratherthe same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently,FIR No. 697/2006 under Sections 406/498A/34IPC registeredat PS Patel Nagar, Delhi and proceedingspursuantthereto are CRL.M.C 3550/2011 hereby quashed. Parties, who are duly identified by their respective counsels, have signedthis order sheet in acknowledgmentof their statementsmade before this Court. The petition is disposed of Order dasti. OCTOBER 24, 2011 'vn' a ^yl\ CRL.M.C. 3550/2011 A

MUKTA GUPTA, J. 6^ —- PoPr • Page 3 (^3 /s/cy.^

71# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3550/2011 VARUN DHAMEJA &ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. . .... Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with SI Birender Singh, PS Patel Nagar. Mr. Himanshu Buttan, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with the power of attorney of Respondent No. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA