- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 29 October 2010
- Bench
- Shiv Narayan Dhingra
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3410/2010
Judgment
ORDER %
29.10.2010 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 2g2l2OO7 under Section 498A/406 read with Section 34 lPC, P.S. Seelampur and FIR No. 302/2007, registered under Section 32313411506 read with Section 34 lPC, P.S. Seelampur on the ground of compromise arrived at between the parties. It is stated by the parties that another petition has been filed which is lying in objections for quashing of FIR No.4212008, under Section 3411392132413071506134 lPC, p.S. Seelampur. lt is further stated by both the parties that they have settled all their disputes and decided to pray for quashing of all proceedings pending against each other including the criminal proceedings pending in the Court of MM under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The petitioner Mohd. Hussain is present in the Court. Complainant Smt. shahjahan is also present with smt. shahista, who is complainant in case FIR No' 4Zl2OOg registered at p.S. Seelampur against the present petitioner Mohd. Hussain. The - Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. a complainants have been identified by Sl Ram Niwas from CAW Cell. A sum of T 3.00 lakh, as agreed to be paid to the complainanVrespondent No. 2 has been handed over to her by way of Bank Drafts. Both parties agree that this compromise was entered into by them voluntarily and that they want that all proceedings initiated by them against each other should be quashed collectively in this petition itself. This request of the parties is allowed. FIR No. 28212007,30212007 and 4212008 all of P.S. Seelampur, registered by the parties against each other under various sections of IPC are hereby quashed. Respondent No. 2 is directed to withdraw the proceeding pending before the Court of MM under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act as well. lf she does not withdraw, the concerned MM shall dismiss the application made by the respondent No. 2 under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act on this basis of this order. The parties shall be bound by the compromise arrived at as Annexure-D. them, annexed SHIV AN DHINGRA,J ocToBER 29,2010 acm a
Case details
Parties and counsel
\ e ? $-35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI cRL.M.C. 341012010 MOHD HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner Through Mr Vijay Klumar Rana, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr Servesh Chand Joshi, Adv. for R-2 SI Ram Niwas P.S. CAW Cell, North-East GORAM: JUSTIGE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.