Sunil Kumar v. State & Anr

ORDER %

04.10.2010 Statement of the complainant/respondent No.2 recorded. The parties have entered into a written Memorandum of Understandingdated 06'*^ September, 2010. The Memorandum of Understanding, according to the learned counsel for the parties, has already been implemented. A Civil Suit ^ filed by the complainant/respondentNo.2 againstthe petitionerbeing Suit No.635/2009 has already been withdrawn from the Court of Civil Judge vide orderdated 15^^ September,2010. The allegations in the FIR were that the complainant/respondent No.2 alongwith the petitioner and others, including her husband were partners in a firm M/s Ever Green Industries and after the death of her husband, the petitioner obtained her signatures on certain papers on a false pretext and \ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. m-' / later on forged documents using those signatures. Considering the nature of the dispute between the parties and an amicable settlement thereof and also considering the fact that the parties are related to each other, no useful purpose would be served from continuing the proceedings that were initiated by the complainant/respondent No.2 against the petitioner. Hence, FIR No.36/2010, under Sections 420/467/468/471/175/506 IPC registered at Police Station Anand Parbat and the proceeding arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to the petitioner's depositing Rs.50,000/- with Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within a week from today and depositing the receipt in the Court with a copy of the receipt to the Investigating Officer. V.K. JAIN, J OCTOBER 04, 2010 bg

$-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3180/2010 SUNIL KUMAR Petitioner Through: Mr Rajesh Kalra, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through: Mr Navin Sharma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN