VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Vinod Kumar v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 November 2011
Bench
M.L. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3303/2009

Judgment

ORDER .1 / o/o

15.11.2011 La This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 12611999, PS Narela, under Sec.39/44 of I.E. act read with Sec. 379 IPC. Counsel for the petitioner has placed on record photocopy of the receipts of deposit of Rs.2,B3 ,37Q/-; 92,608/- and 66,200/- amounting to totaling above Rs.4,35,499l-which was the demand as shown in the notice of respondent No.2/NDPL issued to petitioner. This is in respect of K. No. BWN/516-L222973 /z-203lIP.IN. Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 NDPL has filed an affidavit of Sh. Kulvinder Singh working as HOG-FACG of respondent No.2 wherein ( f he has stated that the record of erstwhile DVB is not traceable. There is no reason to disbelieve the version as stated by the petitioner. No cause of action survives. Consequently, FIR No. 126/1999, PS Narela, under Sec.39/44 of I.E. act read with Sec. 379 IPC and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. NOVEMBER 15,2OlL 'raj' l> M.L. MEHTA, J Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + cRL.M.C. 3303/2009 VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. B.P. Aggarwal, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State Mr. Vishva Wadhwa, Adv for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.