Ashok Kumar Yadav v. N.D.M.C. and Ors

ORDER %

08.10.2012

¶1Present writ petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ, order or direction to the respondent NDMC not to dispossess the petitioner from his present vending site at Gate No.2, AIIMS Ring Road, near subway AIIMS, New Delhi.

¶2As prayed by counsel for the parties present writ petition and application for stay is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

¶3As per the writ petition, petitioner, who is a street vendor, has been carrying on his business of selling readymade garments from a site at Gate No.2, AIIMS Ring Road, near subway AIIMS, New Delhi, since the year 1995. Pursuant to the Scheme announced by NDMC for Urban Street Vendors the petitioner made an application to respondent no.l in the year 2007 for allotment of a regular vending/squatting site under the said scheme. Petitioner was found eligible under the said scheme and his name was included in the list of draw of allottees. r-

¶4On the last date of hearing, this matter was adjourned to enable counsel for the respondent NDMC to obtain instructions. Today, Ms.Ritu Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the respondent NDMC, submits that the name of the petitioner finds mentioned at SI. No.293 in the list of 386 vendors and the petitioner has been allotted an alternate site near Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi.

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that petitioner has objection to the above site allotted to the petitioner by the NDMC.

¶9Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Director (Enforcement), NDMC, on 12.10.2012, along with all the relevant ^ documents, to enable the NDMC to process the case of the petitioner. NDMC shall hand over possession of the abovesaid site to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of all the documents from the petitioner.

¶6In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the respondent NDMC, counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition and the application for stay. Accordingly, writ petition and application stand disposed of \ in above terms.

¶7Let copy of this order be given DASTI to counsel for the parties under the signature of Court Master. ^.S.StSTANI,J OCTOBER 08, 2012 msr W.P.(C) 5897/2012

64. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5897/2012 & CM 12144/2012 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV Petitioner Tlirougln : Mr.Lakshay Sawliney, Adv. versus N.D.M.C. AND ORS Respondents Through : Ms.Ritu Bhardwaj, Adv. for NDMC. Mr.Nav Ratan Chaudhary, Adv. for respondent no.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI