- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 October 2012
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- BAIL APPLN. 1395/2012
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
O R D E R %
13.09.2018 Crl.M.A. No. 29833/2018
By this application, the petitioner seeks release of the sum of ₹5,00,000/- deposited by the petitioner before the Registrar General of this Court pursuant to the order dated 25th September, 2012 on the ground that the petitioner has been discharged in case FIR No. 285/2018 under Sections 408/120B IPC.
On a notice being issued a status report has been filed verifying the fact that the petitioner has been discharged by the learned CMM, Rohini Court on 16th February, 2018 though charge for offence punishable under Section 408 IPC has been framed against co-accused Prakash Verma who was the employee of the company. It is stated that one more accused Virender is a proclaimed offender. BAIL APPLN. 1395/2012
Be that as it may since the petitioner has been discharged in the above noted FIR the amount of ₹5,00,000/- as deposited by the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 25th September, 2012 with the Registrar General in the form of a FDR along with the interest that has accrued thereon be released to the petitioner by the Registry.
Application is disposed of.
Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J. SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 'yo'
BAIL APPLN. 1395/2012
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1395/2012 ARUN PRAKASH VERMA @ BABLOO ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey and Ms. Shweta, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Amit Kumar, PS Subhash Place. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.