- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 October 2011
- Bench
- Suresh Kumar Kait
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3544/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Suresh Kumar Kait
Judgment
ORDER %
24.10.2011
¶1Vide the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed to pass appropriate directions directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to safeguard and protect the petitioners with further direction to initiate efficacious directions to respondent No. 3 to 8 and their family members.
¶2Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that both the petitioners hails from Rajasthan, both of them are major and they married on 10.10.2011.
¶3Notice.
¶4Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP accepts notice on behalf of the State and submits, on instructions from SI Rajpal, that the brother of ( V Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. the petitioner no.2 has lodged a missing report. No FIR has been lodged.
¶5Needless to state that if any threat is received from any corner from respondents No. 3 to 8, the respondent No.2 shall take immediate action on receiving information from them.
¶6No further orders are required.
¶7CrI. M.C. No.3544/2011 is disposed of in the above terms. OCTOBER 24, 2011 RS SURESH KAIT, J 0/
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRLM.C. 3544/2011 MANISH & ANR Petitioners Tiirough : i^ir. Abhisliek Gautam, Adv. versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through : Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APR for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.