- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- S.P.Garg
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2060/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S.P.Garg
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
(1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.93/2014 under Section 135 Electricity Act registered at Police Station Sector 23, Dwarka. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/respondent No.2 amicably.
(2) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 / BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. is present before the Court and informs that the petitioner has paid his all dues and respondent No.2 / BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. CRL.M.C. 2060/2016
(3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties.
(4) Since the matter has been settled between the parties amicably and the entire dues have been paid, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation, FIR No.93/2014 under Section 135 Electricity Act registered at Police Station Sector 23, Dwarka and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
(5) The petition is disposed of accordingly. S.P.GARG, J OCTOBER 26, 2016 / tr CRL.M.C. 2060/2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2060/2016 BALA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Manjeet Godara, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE &ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP with SI Shyam Sunder, PS Sector 23 Dwarka. Ms.Shantala Sankrit, Advocate with Ms.Shubhra Rai & Mr.Tanay, Advocate for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.