Sandhu Singh & Ors v. Ghanshyam Singh & Anr

ORDER %

31.10.2011

¶1Petitionersclaim to be bhumidarsof the subject land ofthis petitionand they assertthat they had filed a petitionfor partition under Section 35 of Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, in the year 2003 and that the same is pending for a long time. Counsel for petitioners has placed on record certified copies of the order sheets to indicate that for one reason or other,, this matter is being unnecessarilyadjournedfrom time to time and states that no triable issue arises and the delay occasioned is to the detriment to the parties.

¶2Despite respondents being put to advance notice of this petition, there is no appearance on their behalf.

¶3The prayer made in this petition is innocuous one i.e. for directionto the SDM/ra,Alipur, Delhi to disposeof the case titled Page 1 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. as 'Sadhu Singh Vs. Ghanshyam Singh', being No.283/SC/CS/N/03 within a reasonable time.

¶4Keeping in view the nature of the prayer made in this petition, it can be disposed of in limini. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and SDM/RA, Alipur, Delhi, is directed to expedite the proceedings in case titled as 'Sadhu Singh Vs. Ghanshyam Singh', being No.283/SC/CS/N/03 and to conclude it preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of being apprised of this order.

¶5With directions as aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.

¶6Dasti. /5^Kgaur, j OCTOBER 31, 2011 rs W.R(C]No.7748/2011 p^gg2

$-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7748/2011 SANDHU SINGH & ORS. PGtitionsrs Through; Mr.lnderpal Khokhar, Advocate versus GHANSHYAMSINGH &ANR, Respondents Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR