- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 2 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3571/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER %
02.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 943/06 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Prashant Vihar, Delhi. The complainant/RespondentNo. 2 is present in person who is identified by the Investigating Officer and her counsel. The complainant states that the disputes between the Petitioner No. 1 and her have been amicably resolved and they are living together as husband and wife for the last one year. In view of the fact that the disputesbetween the parties have CRL.M.C. 3571/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
¶5been resolved the complainant does not want to pursue the present complaint. Since the parties have amicably resolved their difference and the pendency of the present proceedings will bring further acrimony and disharmonybetween the two, it would be in the interestof justice if the present FIR is quashed. Accordingly, FIR No. 943/06 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registeredat PS PrashantVihar,Delhi and the proceedingspursuantthereto are quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgmentof their statements made before this Court. Petition stand disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 02, 2011 'ga' M.C. 3571/2011 t.v^ a MUKTA GUPTA,J gU-page 2 of2 \ PY' 92# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3571/2011 RAJIV KUMAR SOLANKI & ORS Petitioners Through: Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER %
16.03.2012 Crl. M.A. NO. 3354/2012 (modification or order dated 2""* Nov. 2011) By this application the Petitioners seek modification of the order dated 2""* November,2011 quashingthe FIR. According to learned counsel for the Petitioners the FIR number stated in the order has inadvertently been typed as 943/2006 instead of FIR No. 943/2005. The FIR Number in paragraphs 1 and 4 of the order dated 2"'^ November, 2011 be now read as FIR No. 943/2005 instead of 943/2006. Application stands disposed of. MUKTA GUPTA, J MARCH 16, 2012 'vn'
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3571/2011 RAJIV KUMAR SOLANKI & ORS Petitioner Through Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Ram Singh Mr. Sumit Rajput, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.