- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 28 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3749/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
28.11.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 6/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Subzi Mandi, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset states that besides the Petitioner all other co-accused have been discharged and the charge under the aforementioned Sections was framed only against the Petitioner. The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Farzana is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that she has settled the matter and in view of the settlement the Petitioner has paid a sum of Rs. 7 lakhs to her and CRL.M.C. 3749/2011 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. / r Rs. 4.5 lakhs to their daughter. She states that the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are living separately though no talaldi has been pronounced between the parties. Respondent No.2 states that in view of the settlement arrived at, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 6/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Subzi Mandi, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. 'ga' MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 28, 2011 CRL.M.C. 3749/2011 page 2 of2
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3749/2011 ABDUL NASIR ANSARI Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Gautam, Ms. Ashu Jain, Advs. with Petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Yogesh PS Subzi Mandi. Mr. S.C. Agarwal, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.