- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2017
- Bench
- Pratibha Rani
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1736/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
08.11.2017
¶1By way of this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking quashing of case FIR No.94/16 under Sections 420 IPC registered at PS Subzi Mandi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.
¶2Today none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite passover.
¶3Even the direction dated 18th August, 2017 to implead co-accused Haseen @ Qutubuddin as party has not been complied with till date.
¶4It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition.
¶5The writ petition is dismissed in default.
PRATIBHA RANI, J. NOVEMBER 08, 2017 'pg'
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1736/2016 MOHAMMAD GHUFRAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: None versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Mr.Mohit Sharma, Adv. with SI Naveen PS Subzi Mandi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.