Ashish James & Ors v. State of Delhi

ORDER %

23.11.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 18244/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 3849/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 683/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at PS Ramakrishna Puram, New Delhi. The Gomplainant/Petitioner No. 5 Ms. Shweta James is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioner Nos 1 to 4 and Petitioner No. 5/Gomplainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Petitioner No. 5/Gomplainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consentunderSectionlOA ofthe DivorceAct, 1896 on 5^*^ September,2011. CRL.M.C. 3849/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Petitioner No. 5, the Petitioner No. 1 has to pay ^5 lal<dhisout of which laldis have already been paid to her and ^1 lalchs have been pay to her today vide Pay Order No. 736153 dated 22""^ November,2011 drawn on the Royal Bank of Scotland. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 683/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Ramakrishna Puram, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in aclmowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of Order dasti. NOVEMBER 23, 2011 'vn' CRL.M.C. 3849/2011 0)

MUKTA GUPTA, J. Page2 of2 ^ V

62# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3849/2011 ASHISH JAMES & ORS Petitioners Through: Mr. Vinod Ahuja, Advocate for the Petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 with Petitioners in person. Mr. Neeraj Anand, Advocate for Petitioner No. 5 with Petitioner No. 5 in person. versus STATE OF DELPII .... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State with SI Asha Sinha. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA