Gyasi Ram v. Union of India & Anr

ORDER

03.10.2012 CM No.17350/2012 (u/S 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 r/w Sec. 151 CPC for condoning delay) The delay is of 106 days' in filingthe accompanyingappeal.The reason for the delay as disclosed in Paragraph No.6 of the instant applicationis that appellanthad not received any communicationfrom his counsel regarding passing of the impugned order. Notice. Mr. Sanjeev Sahay & Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocates, accept notice of the application on behalf of respondents No.l & 2 respectively. The reason put-forth in Paragraph No.6 of the application is found to be sufficient one and hence, the delay of 106 days' in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. LA.APPNo. 258/2012 Page 1 , t Applicationis disposedof. T.A.APP. 258/2012 Notice. Mr. SanjeevSahay&Mr. Vikas Sood,Advocates,acceptnotice ofthe apphcationon behalfofrespondentsNo.l &2respectively. Upon hearingand on perusalof the impugnedjudgmentwhich reliesupon a decisionofa Coordinatebench ofthis Courtin LA.APP No. 266/2008, 'Jai Singh Vs. UOI & anr. \ renderedon August, 2011, this Courtfinds no infirmityor illegalityin the impugnedorder. As aresultthereof,this appealis dismissed,withno orderas to co^ OCTOBER 03, 2012 rs [L GAUR) JUDGE LA.APPNo. 258/2012 Page 2

$-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP. 258/2012 % GYASI RAM Appellant Through; Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Advocate forR-l/LAC Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocate for Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Advocate forR-2/DSIDC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR