Chatar Singh v. Union of India & Anr

ORDER %

03.10.2012 CM No.17385/2012 (u/S 5 of Limitation Act 1963 r/w Sec. 151 CPC for condoning delay) The delay is of twenty three days' in filing the accompanying appeal. The reason for the delay as disclosed in Paragraph No.6 of the instant application is. that appellant had not received any communication from his counsel regarding passing of the impugned order. Notice. Mr. Sanjeev Sahay & Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocates, accept notice of the application on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2 respectively. The reason put-forth in Paragraph No.6 of the application is found to be sufficient one and hence, the delay of twenty three days' in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. LAAPPNo.260/2012 ^ Page1 % Applicationis disposedof. LA.APR260/2012 Notice. Mr. SanjeevSahay&Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocates,acceptnotice ofthe applicationon behalfofrespondentsNo.l &2respectively. Upon hearingand on perusalofthe impugnedjudgmentwhich relies upon a decisionof a Coordinatebench of this Court in LA.APP No. 266/2008, 'Jai Singh Vs. UOI & anr.rendered on August, 2011, this Courtfinds no infirmityor illegalityin the impugnedorder. As a resultthereof,this appealis dismissed,with no orderas to costs. OCTOBER 03, 2012 rs JNIL GAUR) JUDGE LA.APPNo. 260/2012 Page 2

n f ) $^^13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP. lemon CHATAR SINGH Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Advocate forR-l/LAC Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocate for Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Advocate for R-2/DSIDC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR