Jagdish Chander Atal & Ors v. Union of India & Anr

ORDER %

03.10.2012 CM No.17362/2012 (u/S 5 of Limitation Act 1963 r/w Sec. 151 CPC for condoning delay) The delay is of twenty two days' in filing the accompanying appeal.The reasonfor the delay, as disclosedin ParagraphNo.6 ofthe instant application is that appellant had not received any communication from his counsel regarding passing of the impugned order. Notice. Ml". SanjeevSahay & Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocates,acceptnotice ofthe applicationohbehalfofrespondentsNo.l & 2 respectively. The reason put-forth in Paragraph No.6 of the applicationis found to be sufficient one and hence, the delay of twenty two days' in filing the accompanyingappealis condoned. LA.APPNo.259/2012 Page 1 Applicationis disposedof. TA.APP. 259/2012 Notice. Mr. SanjeevSahay&Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocates,acceptnotice ofthe apphcationon behalfofrespondentsNo.1&2respectively. Upon hearingand on perusalofthe impugnedjudgmentwhich reliesupon a decisionofa Coordinatebenchofthis Court in LA.APP No. 266/2008, 'Jai Singh Vs. UOI & anr.rendered on August, 2011, this Court finds no infirmityor illegalityin the impugnedorder. As a resultthereof,this appealis dismissed,withno orderas to costs. OCTOBER 03, 2012 rs 5UNIL GAUR) JUDGE LA.APPNo.259/2012 Page 2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP. 259/2012 JAGDISHCHANDERATAL&ORS. Appellants Through: Mr. S.K. Yadav,Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. SanjeevSahay,Advocate forR-l/LAC Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocate for Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Advocate for R-2/DSIDC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR