- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3601/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER o/o
03.11.2011 This is a petitionfor quashingof FIR No. 314/2004under Sections 498A/406A/34 IPG registered at PS Adarsh Nagar, New Delhi on the complaint on Respondent No. 2. The complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Ms. ManishiSharmais presentin personand is identifiedby her counsel. She statesthat the Petitionersand RespondentNo.2/Complainanthave enteredinto a Compromise.In terms of the settlement,maniage betweenthe PetitionerNo. 1 and RespondentNo. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consenton 17^'' September,2011. As part of full and fmal settlementof all the claims of the RespondentNo. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid Rs. 8,50,000/-out of which Rs. 5,95,000/- lakhs have alreadybeen paid to her and remainingRs. 2,55,000/- have been paid today in Court by way of Manager's Cheque bearing No. "019040". Drawn at HDFC Bank, Outer Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Circle,New Delhi. She furtherstatesthat in view of the settlementbetween the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purposewill be served in continuanceofthe proceedings,ratherthe same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impedimentin quashing the FIR in question. Consequently,314/2004underSections498A/406A/34IPC registered at PS AdarshNagar,New Delhiand proceedingspursuanttheretoare hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in aclmowledgmentof their statements made before this Court. The petitionandthependingapplicationare disposedof. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 03, 2011 r-7
Case details
Parties and counsel
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3601/2011 & Crl. M.A. No. 12843/2011(Exemption) SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA & ORS Petitioner Through Mr. Ajit SinghArora,Advocate versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Mr. MukeshGupta,APP for the State. Mr. R. K. Tarun, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.