- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 29 November 2010
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.REV.P. 703/2007
Judgment
ORDER . 29.11.2010 Despite pass over nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. On 2"d November, 2010 last opportunity was granted to the petitioner to serve respondent no. 2 subject to payment of cost of Again ·no process fee has been filed by the petitioner for service of notice to respondent no. 2 nor has the fresh address of respondent no. 2 been filed in terms of order dated 2"d November, 2010. The proof of payment of cost of has also not been filed. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. NOVEMBER 29,2010 Rs t::::; !:!;- Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
-• * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 703/2007 VIJAY PAL YADAV ..... Petitioner % Through: None. versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP with ASI Mohinder Singh PS Kapeshera CORAM: . HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.