VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2012 › High Court of Delhi

Dlf Construction Limited v. Dlf Hotels & Apartments Pvt Ltd

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 October 2012
Bench
Indermeet Kaurauthor
Case no.
CO.APPL.(M) 163/2012

Judgment

INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

¶1This is a first motion application under section 391 & 394 of the e

Companies Act, 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation of DLF Construction Limited & another with DLF Projects Limited. A copy of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation is filed along with the Application.

¶2The registered office of the Applicant / Transferor Company no. 1 is situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and is within the jurisdiction of this Court.

¶3The registered office of Transferor Company no. 2 and the Transferee Company are situated within the State of Haryana. It is submitted by the Counsel for Applicant that the First Motion Petition has been allowed by the High Court for the States of Punjab & Haryana.

¶4Learned Counsel for the Applicant Company submitted that no proceedings under sections 235 and 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against any of the Applicant Company as on date of the present Application.

¶5The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Applicant Company. Copies of the Board Resolution has been filed along with the Application.

¶6The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor and Transferee Companies and consents obtained from them for the proposed Scheme is clearly apparent from the chart given in the application which is as below :- No. of Share holders Consents given No. of secured creditors Consent given No. of unsecured creditors Consents given Applicant / Transferor no. 1 Seven Ann. P- (Pg. 318) All Ann. P-17 ( Pg. 319-322 ) Nil N.A. Ann. P-15 (Pg.315 to 317A) _* *The Applicant Company is proposing to convene and hold meeting of its unsecured creditors under the supervision of this Hon'ble Court.

¶7A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of the convening meetings of the Shareholders of the Applicant Company / Transferor Company no. 1.

¶8In view of the written consent / NOC given, the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders of the Applicant Company / Transferor Company no. 1 is dispensed with.

¶9Separate meeting of Un-Secured Creditors of the Applicant Company / Transferor Company no. 1 is proposed to be held under the supervision of this court. Consequently, I direct that meeting of Un-

Secured Creditors of the Applicant Company / Transferor Company no. 1 shall be held on 22.12.2012 ( Saturday ) at 10.30 a.m. at D-26, Medico House, Janakpuri Institutional Area, Janakpuri New Delhi - 110058.

¶10Ms. R. Kiran Nath, Officer of this Court, Cell no. 9910384659 is appointed as the Chairperson and Mr. H.C. Suri, Officer of this Court, Cell no. 9910390929 is appointed as the Alternate Chairperson for the meeting of the Un-Secured Creditors of the Applicant Company / Transferor Company no. 1. They would be paid a fee of Rs. 50,000/- each. Mr. Narender Kumar, Cell no. 9560595909 and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Cell no.9650059116 shall provide secretarial assistance to the Chairperson and the Alternate Chairperson. They shall be paid a fee of Rs. 10,000/-each for this purpose.

¶11The Applicant Company / Transferor Company no. 1 is also directed to publish advance notice of the aforesaid proposed meeting in 'Business Standards' ( English, Delhi Edition ) and 'Jansatta' ( Hindi, Delhi Edition ). The advertisements shall be published minimum 21 days in advance before the scheduled date of meeting.

¶12Individual notices of the proposed meeting would be sent by ordinary post minimum 21 days in advance before the scheduled date of meeting. The Chairperson will ensure that dispatch is made under his / her supervision / or his authorized representative.

¶14The quorum of the Unsecured Creditors are fixed as follows: No. Un-Secured Creditors …..% the Applicant Company / Transferor Company no. 1 10%

¶15It is also directed that if the quorum is not present in the meeting, the meeting would be adjourned for 30 minutes and the persons present in the meeting would be treated as proper quorum.

¶16Voting and proxy is permitted provided that the proxy in the prescribed form and duly singed by the person entitled to attend and vote at the aforesaid meeting or by his authorized representative, is filed with the company at its registered office, not later than 48 hours before the said meeting.

¶17The Chairman/Alternate Chairman shall file their reports within 2 weeks of the conclusion of the meeting.

¶18The application stand allowed in the aforesaid terms. Order Dasti

INDERMEET KAUR, J OCTOBER 15, 2012/rb

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI th% Date of Judgment:15 October, 2012 + CO.APPL. (M) 163/2012 IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 391 AND 394 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND IN THE MATTER OF: THE SCHEME OF AMALGAMATION OF DLF CONSTRUCTION LIMITED ……Applicant /Transferor Company No. 1 AND DLF HOTELS & APARTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED ……Non-applicant /Transferor Company No.2 WITH DLF PROJECTS LIMITED ..…Transferee Through Mr. Ravi Bassi, Advocate for the Applicant CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.