- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 4 November 2011
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3636/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
04.11.2011 The petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present. Petitioners are identified by Ms S. Nizam, Advocate and respondent No. 2 has been identified by 10 SI Umed Singh. The petitioners and respondent No. have arrived at a settlement. The respondent No. 2 states that he has settled the matter voluntarily, without any force and coercion. In view of the settlement between the parties, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR and the proceedings. Consequently, FIR No. 424/2011, P.S.Hari Nagar ^under Section 420/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. The petition stands disposed of. M.L. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 04, 2011 awanish Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
I $-63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3636/2011, Crl. M.A. 12967/2011 S NAGENDER SINGH & ANR • Petitioner Through Ms S. Nizam, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Ms Jasbir Kaur, Addl. PR with SI Umed Singh, P.S. Hari Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.