- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 October 2012
- Bench
- Rajiv Shakdher
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 6338/2012
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Rajiv Shakdher
Judgment
ORDER %
10.10.2012 In the captioned petitions notice was issued on 03.10.2012. It was recorded on that day that the petitioners are in the business of selling craclcers,for which purpose they require a temporary tehbazari license. The petitioners have, undoubtedly, approached respondent no. 4 in that regard and made a representation qua grant of a tehbazari license, dated
24.08.2012. It is the petitioners' case that the fate of this representation will determine as to whether or not they get the requisite permissions from the Delhi Police and the Fire Department. Mr Mukesh Gupta has put in an appearance on behalf of respondent ~ no. 4. He says that he has instructions to state that the representation dated
24.08.2012 will be disposed of within two days from today by way of a speaking order. He further submits that the petitioners will be called for a personal hearing. The petitioners are directed to appear before Mr S.D. Sharma, Assistant Commissioner (Central) today at 4.00 p.m. The order passed will be communicated to the petitioner. While considering the representation of the petitioners, the concerned officer will bear in mind the order of the court • dated 31.08.2012 passed in WP(C) No. 5085/2012 titled Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Ors. vs Dy. Commissioner, MCD And Anr. WP(C)Nos. 6336/20120, 6337/2012 & 6338/2012 ' With the aforesaid observations in place, learned counsel for me petitioners says that he does not wish to press the captionedpetitions. The writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. Dasti under the signatures of the court master. OCTOBER 10,2012 Idi WP(C)Nos. 6336/20120, 6337/2012 & 6338/2012 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 11-0 ma ^
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-2-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI X + W.P.(C) 6336/2012 ANIL KUMAR Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K. Sinha & Ms Seema Kashyap, Advs.. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through: Mr Nitin Saluja, Adv. for Mr. Nazimi Waziri, Standing Counsel R-1 to 3. Mr Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for R-4/MCD. + W.P.(C) 6337/2012 VIJAY KUMAR Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K. Sinha & Ms Seema Kashyap, Advs. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through: Mr Nitin Saluja, Adv. for Mr. Nazimi Waziri, Standing Counsel R-1 to 3. Mr Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for R-4/MCD. AND + W.P.(C) 6338/2012 BAL KISHAN SHARMA Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K. Sinha & Ms Seema Kashyap', Advs. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents WP(C)Nos. 6336/20120, 6337/2012 & 6338/2012 Page 1 of 3 • u Through: Mr NitinSaluja,Adv. for Mr. NazinT|' Waziri, Standing Counsel R-1 to 3. Mr Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for R-4/MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.