- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 January 2017
- Bench
- Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Satinder Kumar Gautam (Dhjs)
- Case no.
- EX.P. 268/2013
Judgment
O R D E R %
25.01.2017 The decretal amount is less than two crores rupees. As per Section 4 of Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act 2015 (Act 23 of 2015) which came into effect from 26.10.2015 vide notification No. F. No L-19015/04/2012 Jus dated 26.10.2015 and extracts of the minutes dated 20.10.2016, the execution petition is liable to be transferred before the concerned District Court. Learned counsel for the decree holder submits that the address of the judgment debtor is situated at Model Town which falls within jurisdiction of North District as such requested to send the matter before the Learned District & Session Judge (North District) Rohini Court.
In view of the submission & circumstances, let the matter be sent to the Ld District & Session Judge, (North District) Rohini Court.
Parties be directed to appear before the Court of Ld District & Session Judge (North District), Rohini Court on 23.03.2017.
The suit files be made available to the Ld District & Session Judge (North District ) at Rohini Court on the date fixed.
DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS)
JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
JANUARY 25, 2017 SK
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 268/2013 RAJ KUMAR MAHESHWARI ..... Decree Holder Through: Ms Pragya Kureel, Adv versus JYOTI GUPTA ..... Judgement Debtor Through: appearance not given CORAM: DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.