- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 14 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1545/2011
Judgment
ORDER oh t4.tt.20tl This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 15012010 under Sections 498N1406134IPC registered at PS Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi. 'I'he cornplainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Satvinder Bagga is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settletnent, maniage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2lComplainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by inutual consent on 27't'August, 20IL As full and final settlement of all the clairns of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. t has to pay {4 lakhs out of which {2 VETSUS STATE & ANR w.P.(cRL) 1s4s/2011 Page I of 2 .Ja ,\ lakhs have already been paid to her and {2 lakhs have been today vide Demand Draft No. 304309 dated ITth August, 201I drawn on Punjab National Bank, West Patel Nagar. She further states that in view of the settlement between the pafties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful putpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 15012010 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parlies have signed this order sheet in acknowledgrnent of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. frIu"Xh..h"pb / iuruxrlc'rf;rr.q. r. NOVEMBER I4,2OII/'VN' $ NS w.P.(cRL) 1s4s/20r1 s ryo -v w$'.:*J =ft" -.5" *tr ,uffirr*,,,/^al4.
Case details
Parties and counsel
F 6e# $- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) rs4s/201r MANPREET SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Prag Chawla and Mr. Sudeep Sudan, Advocates with petitioners in CORAM: person. Through: Ms. Laxmi Chul'rhurr, h*":lrltT:t Mr. Pawan Shanna, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Vivek Singh, PS Ranjit Nagar. Mr. P.S. Premi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent No. 2 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.