Tej Bahadur Rai & Anr v. Parveen Kumar Jain & Anr

ORDER %

14.11.2011 Despite pass-over none is present on behalf of the Petitioners. Even on the last date none was present on behalf of the Petitioners. In this case execution of non-bailable warrants against the Petitioners was stayed vide order dated 22"^ March, 2010 on the statement of the Petitioners that they were tiying to arrive at a settlement. Respondent No. 1 who is present in person also states that though initially payments were made, however, thereafter no payment is being made and the cheques issued the Petitioners have already bounced. Since none is present on behalf of the Petitioners today and none was present on the last date of hearing, petition and applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.

MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 14, 2011 'vn' Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

23# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 565/2009 & Crl. M.A. 4335/2011 & 4336/2011 TEJ BAHADUR RAI & ANR. Petitioner Through: None. versus PARVEEN KUMAR JAIN «& ANR. Respondents Through: Respondent No. 1 in person. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA