Tej Bahadur Rai & Anr v. Parveen Kumar Jain & Anr

24# S- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NIIW DELHI + CI{L.REV.P. 56612009 &. Crl. M.A. 433712011 & 433812011 TEJ BAI-IADIJI{ RAI & ANR 'fhrough: None. VETSUS PARVEEN KUMAR JAIN & ANR. ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents Through: Respondent No. 1 in person. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDEIT

14.11.2011 Despite pass-over none is present on behalf of the Petitioners. Even on the last date none was present on behalf of the Petitioners. In this case execution of non-bailable warrants against the Petitioners was stayed vicle order dated 22"d March, 2Olti on thc staternent of the Pctitioners that they were trying to arrive at a settlement. Itespondent No. I who is present in person also states that though initially payments were made, however, thereafter no payment is being made and the cheques issued the Petitioners have already :0,L, bounced. Since none is present on behalf of the Petitioners today and none was present on the last date of hearing, petition and applications arc dismissed for non-prosecution. l,r,X6--ML MUKTA GUPTA. J. NOVEMBER I4,2OII tvnt Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.