Tej Bahadur Rai & Anr v. Parveen Kumar Jain & Anr

ORDER

14.tt.20Ll Despite pass-over none is present on behalf of the Petitioners. Even on the last date none was present on behalf of the Petitioners. In this case execution of non-bailable warrants against the Petitioners was stayed vide order dated 22"d March, 2010 on the statement of the Petitioners that they were trying to arrive at a settlement. Respondent No. 1 who is present in person also states that though initially payments were rnade, however, thereafter no payment is being made and the cheques issued the Petitioners have alrea*, ffi'borrnced. Since none.is present on behalf of the Petitioners today and none was present on the last date of hearing, petition and applications are dismissed for non-prosecution. IMffi-NOVEMBER I4,2OII tvnt MUKTA GUPTA. J. J Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

22# $- * IN THE HIGH CQITRT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 56412009 & Crl. M.As.433312011 & 4334/2011 ..... Petitioners TEJ BAHADUR RAI & ANR. Through: None. VEISUS PARVEEN KUMAR JAIN & ANR. ..... Respondents " Through: Respondent No. I in person. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA