VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Balraj Kumar v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
17 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1571/2011

Judgment

ORDER

17.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 28612010 under Sections 406142014681471IPC registered at PS Sunlight Colony, Delhi. The complainantlRespondent No. 2 is present in person who is identified by the Investigating Officer and her counsel. The complainant states that because of the matrimonial disputes, the abovementioned FIR got registered as the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 are also directors of the company. She fuither states that the disputes between the Petitioner No. I and her have been amicably resolved and they are living together as husband and wife for the last one year. In view of the fact that the disputes between ..... Petitioner Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Advocate with Petitioner in Person. ..... Respondent Ms. Urvi Kuthiala, Proxy counsel for Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State SI Sandeep. Mr. PRatik Bhatta, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. o the parties have been resolved the complainant does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and proceedings pursuant thereto. Learned counsel for the State states that in the abovementioned FIR, the interest of no other person accept Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 is involved. Since the parties have amicably resolved their difference and the pendency of the present proceedings will bring further acrimony and disharmony between the two, it would be in the interest of justice if the present FIR is quashed. Accordingly, FIR No. 286/2010 under Sections 406142014681471IPC registered at PS Sunlight Colony, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. Petition stands disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER I7,2OII hAref'lf'fL l/ v'

MUKTA GUPTA, J. Itt-fr @t, ,uo:z) 'dk'.*s tP" +-,/.r**-) 3i <-r\l ['A'14/w W 92 -s^a/c^'l hr G>L1"7 Z-o , €)- st-g>&l w l+tvo t e't P o laa=.q l^oto ,i:bk rclgq

Case details

Parties and counsel

$- {< IN THE IIIGH COURT w.P.(cRL) rs7rtz}tr .BALRAJ KUMAR Through: OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI VETSUS STATE & ANR Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.