- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 17 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1576/2011
Judgment
ORDER o t7.tt.20tl .This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 25112008 under Sections 498N406IPC registered at PS Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi. The complainantlRespondent No. 2 Ms. Anur?dhu is present in person and is identified by her counsel and the investigating officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2lcomplainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 10th March, 20IL As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2,the Petitioner No. t has paid T1.40 lakhs and jewellery out of which { One lakh and the jeweler have already been paid/returned to her and remaining { 40,0001-have been w.P.(cRL) rs76120rr RAJ KUMAR & ANR Through VETSUS STATE & ORS Through ally Signed MULYA ure Not Verified [ ,rtl-t paid to her in Court toady by way a Pay Order No. "459252" drawn on CanaraBank, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful putpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fuither acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No. 25112008 under Sections 498N406 IPC registered at PS Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. w@ 'MUKTA GUPTAOJ NOVEMBER 17,20ll ^ tdk' (l'1u"*"e !^*s.*t'} Jt[-< u: €w 3?.qT' "/
Case details
Parties and counsel
$- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Arora. Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohd, APP for the State with SI Surajpal. Mr. Rajiv Sachar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.