Bani Singh v. State & Anr

ORDER oh

01.112010 Leamed counsel for the Petitioner savs that in this case the Resoondent was already discharged for offences committed under the Provision of Section 3 of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The present Revision Petition is against the said order of discharge. The parties have entered into a settlement and in terms of the settlement, as recorded in order dated 20tr'May, 2}7},leamed counsel for the Petitioner wants to withdraw the present Revision Petition. Leamed counsel for the Petitioner states that he would also withdraw his complaint pending before the learned Metropolitan Magisffate for the offences relating to IPC. In view of the statement of leamed counsel for the Petitioner. the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. IN THE IIIGH COURT CRL.REV .P . 7 41 12007 BANI SINGH Through: versus STATE & ANR. Through: /lrtt"X,fr^.-ffi-N MUKTA GUPTA. J. NOVEMBER 01, 2010/vn Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

5# $- * + OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Mr. Lalit Kr. Laam. Advocate ..... Respondents Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with Insp. J.D. Meena, PS Sangam Vihar, Delhi. Mr. Anil K. Gujral, Advocate for R-2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA