Bhoop Singh and Ors v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

ORDER 2l.tt.20ll

¶1Petitioners claim to be in cultivating possession of Khasra Nos. 21l18 (4-16), 19 (4-16),22 (4-16) and 23 (4-16), in Khatoni No. 412, situated in the revenue estate of Village-Bawana, Delhi. They are aggrleved by non-recording of the Khasra Girdawari for the last two crops i.e. Kharif and Rabi Crop, though they had moved applications on 06.09.2010 and

04.02.2011 and again on 08.09.201I [Annexure-P3 (colly)] for recording of Khasra Girdwari.

¶2Counsel for petitioners places reliance upon the order of 18.03 .2009 in W.P.(C) No. 2997/2008, titled as 'Bhoop Singh & Ors. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi', to assert that in pursuance to the said order (Annexure-P-5), Khasra tf '-4 W.P.(C) No. B1-86/2011 Page L Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. t Girdawari for the preceding 2 crops stands already recorded.

¶3The aforesaid order of 18.03.2009 (Annexure P-4) observes that recording of Khasra Girdawari is to be done in accordance with the provisions of Delhi Land Revenue Act. It was also noted therein that there is a dispute in respect of the land in question, as vide order of 17.09. 1992, the land in question was directed to be vested in the gaon sabha and at that time, the said matter was pending before the Financial Commissioner, Delhi.

¶4Petitioners' counsel states that as of today also the said matter is pending. Be that as it may. Recording of Khasra Girdawari rs to be done by the Patwari concerned as per Rule 54 of the Delhi Land Revenue Rules, 1962. Though the applications of 06.09.2010 and 04.02.2011 as well as application/ reminder of 08.09.2011 [Annexure-P3 (colly)] is filed before the Tehstldar concemed, but it is expected that the said applications would be placed by the respondents before the Patwari concerned, who shall deal with the same expeditiously in accordance with the rules i.e. preferably within a period of 12 weeks.

¶5With observations as aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. CM No. 18441/2011 (u/S 151 CPC) Dismissed as infructuous. NOVEMBER 2I,201.I rs T-. li. :<( TL GAUR, J W.P.(C) No. B186/2011 Page2

$-e * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT w.P.(c) 8186/2011 BHOOP SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate VETSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR NEW DELHI ..... Petitioners F ..... Respondent