Sandeep Kumar @ Banti & Ors v. State & Anr

ORDER %

21.11.2011 Crt. MA 18125/2011 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 381612011 This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing the FIR No.435 of 2007 under Sections 341/323/506/406/498A/34 IPC registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. The parties are present with their respective counsels and are identified by them. It is informed that divorce by mutual consent has already been granted vide order dated 1.6.2011. The respondent no.2 has already received a sum of Rs.1.5 lac and the remaining amount of Rs.55,000/- has been paid today in the court. The respondent /complainant present in person concedes to the compromise having been arrived at between the parties. She states that she has entered into compromise with the petitioners of her own free will, consent, volition and without any pressure or coercion and now she does not intend to prosecute the present FIR. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, the petition is allowed and FIR No.435 of 2007 under Sections 3411323/506/406/498A/34 ----, ---' Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. · @ IPC registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. /?. NOVEMBER 21, 2011 rd M.L. MEHTA,J - -!

(0 * IN THE IDGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3816/2011 SANDEEP KUMAR @ BANTI & ORS ..... Petitioner Through:Mr. Navin Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate versus STATE&ANR CORAM: Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for the complainant/respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA