VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Surjeet Singh @ Laloo & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
28 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3922/2011

Judgment

ORDER

28.11.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 18480/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 3922/2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.999/2004 under Sections 323/341/308/34 IPC registered at PS Malviya Nagar, New Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 2 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dawar and Respondent No. 3 Mr. Vijay Kumar Dawar are present in Court and are identified by their learned counsel. They state that the matter has been settled between the CRL.M.C. 3922/2011 '' '' '' :< ' '' t I i :,.': I 1'-,' :·:: i,' r Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ____ , C9 parties and in this regard a Compromise Deed has been annexed at page 24 of the present petition. They further state that in view of the settlement between the parties, they do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No.999/2004 under Sections 323/3411308/34 IPC registered at PS Malviya Nagar, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. . The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 28, 2011 'vn' CRL.M.C. 392212011 Page 2 of2 b I :. i:j i' (' ,,,u I ' ' ' ' :.'; I r· l\ _._£_ 'J>L (1/'c, 03o _ i j,Pl./a:2/btJ!/aJJj L.:··· rp s; J))-); ,ii1 c\tt .(? c;) J2 ' Jo!JV\ tt-; St.-1Gt1-No - A •. L-1.-:...Y Sz__ I r D/?l(J)D(

Case details

Parties and counsel

71# (D * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3922/2011 Ofo SURJEET SINGH @ LALOO & ORS ..... Petitioners versus Through: Sanj eev K. Baliyan, Advocate with petitioners in person. STATE & ANR ..... Respondents CORAM: Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. Mr. Vijay Kinger, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.