- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3904/2011
Judgment
ORDER
25.11.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 18397/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 3904/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 212/2009 under Sections 498A/406/323/506 IPC registered at PS Neb Sarai, Delhi. The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Savita is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer and her counsel. The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 states that the disputes between the CRL.M.C. 3904/2011 ---·-' --" ·,· Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. {jJ Petitioner No. 1 and her have been amicably resolved and they are living together as husband and wife. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 212/2009 under Sections 498A/406/323/506 IPC registered at PS Neb Sarai, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 25, 2011 'vn' CRL.M.C. 3904/2011 <A ,,_ . ' . ...... Q't\b.., '? H • .\....- '\ \ &>"'"'
MUKTA GUPTA, J. Page 2 of2 j<.;'J-' .. ""' c'b u\i" "::7¥ -:z..:, S l \(-c:;A c,' ,-·
Case details
Parties and counsel
Q 86# * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3904/2011 0/o MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Srivastav, Advocate with Petitioner in person. STATE & ORS ..... Respondents CORAM: Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with SI Dev Karan/ IO Traffic and SI P.N. Verma, PS Neb Sarai. Mr. R.K. Saxena, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent No.2 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.