- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 16 October 2012
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- CO.PET. 455/2009
Judgment
ORDER Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. % 16.10.2012 Parties have settled their disputes. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permissiOn of this Court to withdraw these petitions. Permission is granted. Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. A INDERMEET KAUR, J OCTOBER 16, 2012 rb
4.
Case details
Parties and counsel
$A14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 454/2009 M/S RACHNA PRAKASHAN(P) LTD .....Petitioner Through Dr. Surat Singh and Ms. Esha Majumdar, Adv. versus MIS GOLDEN PAPER MART Respondent Through None. + CO.PET. 455/2009 MIS RACHNA PRAKASHAN(P) LTD 'Petitioner Through Dr. Surat Singh and Ms. Esha Majumdar, Adv. versus MIS GURDAYAL & SONS Respondent Through None. + CO.PET. 456/2009 M/S RACHNA PRAKASHAN(P) LTD Petitioner Through Dr. Surat Singh and Ms. Esha Majumdar, Adv. versus M/S DHARMESH ART PROCESS & PRINT PVT LTD Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.