VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Cit v. Clc Corporation

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 February 2011
Bench
A.K.Sikri, M.L. Mehta
Case no.
ITA 184/2011

Judgment

Judgment Reserved on: 10.02.2011 Decision Delivered On: 18.02.2011

(26) ITA 723/2009 ITA.No. ITA 404/2010 •VERSUS PRIYAfSSKA OVERSEAS P. LTD. . . .RESPONDEiSIT COUNSEL FOR THE REVENUE: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Mr. Abhishek Maratha, . Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Mr. Anupam Tripathi,Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amit Srivastava, Advocate. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEES: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Advocate with Mr. Kavita Jha, Mr. Somnath Shul<la, Mr. Prakash Kumar and Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. O.P. Sapra, ,Mr. Amit Dayal, Mr. Pankaj Jain, Mr. D.K. Goyal, Mr. Vijay Nair and Mr. Manish Chaudhary, Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate with Mr. RK. Aggarwal,. Ms. Poonam Ahuja, Advocates. CORAM HON'BLE |V|R. JUST0CE A.K. SBKR! HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

¶1Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment?

¶2To be referred to the Reporter or not?

¶3Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest? A.K. SaKRI. I.

¶1For orders, see ITA 12 of 2011. FEBRUARY 18, 2011, skb (A.IC. JUDGE [M.L.MEHTA) jyOGE-J ITA No. ITA 404/2010 C IN THE HiG'H COU^T OF.

(1) BTA 12/2011 Judgm Decisi OF BNCOME TAX PARAMOUNT IMPEX PVT. LTD.. ,

(2) BTA 404/2010 ARJAN IMPEX-PVT. LTD.

(3) ITA 708/2010 CdMMJSSDONER SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. C4) BTA 793/2010 OF SNCOME TAX •PHILCO EXPORTS.

(5)- BTA 927/2010 COMMBSSIONER ff^HILCO EXPORTS

(6) ITA 1080/2010 OF INCOME TAX . SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. •

(7) BTA 1886/2010 ' ITANo. ITA 12/2011 Bnt Reserved on: 10.02.2011 on Delivered On:

18.02.2011 . . . APPELLANT . . RESPONDENT .•. APPELLANT 1-mrm komar sadh m ITA 1887/2010 ' KAPOOR INDOSTRIES. ,

(9) PTA 1896/2010 FOL KAUJJHA

(10) ITA 1899/201Q PAL ENTERPRISES

(11) ITA 1957/2010' . VERSUS PRAVEEN INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.

(12) ITA 1958/2010 . ZENELINS LEATHER WEAR '

(13) ITA 1959/2010 RICHA APPARELS

(14) 1,960/2010 ITANo, ITA 12/2011 IS- . . .RESPONDENT V. . APPELLANT .... APPELLANT I CONBVSiSSiONER I iCAPOOR IWDOSTRiES

(15) CTA 1980/2010) I COMMSSSiONER OF ilSiCOME TAX RADIOS

(16) BTA 2074/2010 SHOREWALA OVERSEAS ITA 14/2011 OF SNCOME TAX SANGEETA iTA 15/2011 LEATHER TECH

(19) BTA 67/2011 ROROLATOR INDIA LTD.

(20) BTA 177/2011 BALDEV RAJ JAGGI

(21) ITA 178/2011 ITANo. ITA 12/2011 • 13-JIT , COMMiSSiOMER OF DMCOME TAX GUPTA

(22) 8TA 181/2011 COMNiSSiOiSfiER SAMGEETAJAIN 182/2011 OF BNCOME TAX CLC CORPORATION

(24) ITA 184/2011 ' OF'INCOME TAX , CLC CORPORATION

(25) ITA 185/2011 VI6CAS BCALRA

(26) ITA 187/2011 ANOJ GOEL . • APPELLANT "RESPONDENT . = APPELLANT Judgment Reserved on: 10.02.2011 Decision Delivered On: 18.02.2011

(27) ITA 723/2009 " OF INCOME ITANo. ITA 12/2011 ors.connected " APPELLANT PRIYANKA OVERSEAS P, LTD. COUNSEL FOR THE REVENUE: Mr. Kamal Ss Ms. Suruchi Standing Cc Advocate. . . .RESPOMDE5SST ' whney, Mr. Abhishek Maratha, ^ggarwal, Mr. Anupam Tripathi,Sr. unsel with Mr. Amit Srivastava, COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEES: Mr. Ajay Voh Mr. Somnath Mr. Manish Dayal, Mr. Pa Nair and Mr Gupta, Advo Poonam Ahuj CORAM HOSSI'BLE MR. JOSTBCE A.SC. SliCR HON'BLE MR. JOSTDCE MX. MEH

¶1Wliether Reporters of Local new to see the Judgment?

¶2To be referred to the Reporter o

¶3Whether the Judgment should b ra. Advocate with Mr. Kavita Jha, Shukia, Mr. Prakash Kumar and Kumar, Mr. O.P. Sapra, ,Mr. Amit nkaj Jain, Mr. D.K. Goyal, Mr. Vijay' Manish Chaudhary, Dr. Rakesh ;ate with Mr. RK. Aggarwal, Ms. a, Advocates. TA papers may be allovyed r not? Breported in the Digest? A.K. SBKRL L >

¶1All these appeals involved common of convenience, we can reproduce the qi these appeals:- , "(a) Whether on a correc relevant statutory provisions, law in directing the Asse deduction under section 80H of "profit" on sale of DEPB?

(b)Whether on the facts of th was justified in law in impli assessee would be entitled first proviso below sub-Sectio respect of DEPB Credit utilize question of law. For the sake estions of law framed in one of interpretation of the Tribunal was justified n ssing Officer to allow rIC of the Act in respect e present case,-Tribunal iedly holding that the -Q deduction as per the n 3 of Section 80HHC in d by the assessee?"

¶2The orders passed by the Tribunal in all these cases are brief because of the reason that the Tribuna was supposed to) the decision of the ITAT case of Topman Export \/s. STO [ITA N dated 11''" August, 2009.]. By that judgifi ITA No. ITA 12/2011 has simply followed (which it Special Bench, Mumbai in the

¶35769/Mum./2006 decided on ent, the Special Bench of the Tribunal has held that the face value of d£

(iiib) at the time of accrual of income, thb DEPB is filed with the competent autho profit in sale of DEPB representing, the ex over its face value is liableto be consider^ sale.. PB is chargeable to tax u/s 28 t is, when the application for rity pursuant to exports, and cess of sale proceeds of DEPB d u/s 28(iiid) at the time of its

¶3The Revenue had filed the appeal in the High Court Adjudicate at Bombay against the aforesaid decision of The Bombay High Court has reversed th^ the judgment of the Bombay. High Court of Smcome Tax Us. Kafpataru CoSomrs

¶4Since the Tribunal had simply follow topman Exports (supra) which stands order passed by the Tribunal in all these c to ..the Tribunal to decide these appeal^ account factual position in all these cases. the Special Bench of the ITAT. decision of the Tribunal and is reported as CommBsssoiner Chemicals, 328 ITR 451. ved Special Bench decision in over ruled, we set aside the ases and remit the cases back on merits after taking into

¶5These appeals stand disposed of on above terms. FEBROART 18, 2011, skb iTANo. ITA 12/2011 (A.K.SIKRB) JUDGE

Case details

Parties and counsel

* THE HBGH COURT OF DELHI! AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: 10.02.2011 Decision Delivered On: 18.02.2011 (1) ITA 404/2010 ARJAN IMPEX PVT. LTD. (2) ITA 708/2010 SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. (3) ITA 793/2010 PHILCO EXPORTS. (4) ITA 927/2010 PHSLCO EXPORTS (5) ITA 1080/2010 SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. (6) ITA 1886/2010 NITIN KUMAR SADH ITA No. ITA 404/2010 . . . APPELLANT Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. (7) 8TA 1887/2010 COMMSSSIONER SCAPOOR INDUSTRIES. IS) ITA 1896/2010 FOL SCANT JHA (9) ITA 1899/2010 ,VERSUS PAL ENTERPRISES (10) ITA 1957/2010 PRAVEEN INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. (11) ITA 1958/2010 ZENELINI LEATHER WEAR (12) ITA 1959/2010 OF BNCOME TAX RiCHA APPARELS (13) 1960/2010 OF BNCOME TAX KAPOOR INDUSTRIES ITA No. ITA 404/2010 & ors.connected matters' . ...RESPONDENT , . APPELLANT (14) ITA 1980/2010 AHUJA RADIOS (15) ITA 2074/2010 SHOREWALA OVERSEAS (16) ITA 14/2011 SANGEETA JAIN (17) ITA 15/2011 LEATHER TECH (18) ITA 67/2011 PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. (19) ITA 177/2011 BALDEV RAJ JAGGI ITA No. ITA 404/2010 . . .RESPONDENT . . .RESPONDENT . . .RESPONDENT ; . . .RESPONDENT . . .RESPONDENT (20) ITA 178/2011 ' INDU GUPTA (21) ITA 181/2011 SANGEETA JAIN {22) ITA 182/2011 CLC CORPORATION (23) ITA 184/2011 CLC CORPORATION (24) ITA 185/2011 ^ VIKAS KALRA (25) ITA 187/2011 ANUJ GOEL . . .RESPONDENT " . APPELLANT . . .RESPONDENT . . "RESPONDENT . . .RESPONDENT " . APPELLANT

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.