VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Mahesh Kumar & Ors v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 November 2011
Bench
M.L. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3903/2011

Judgment

ORDER

25.11.2011 Crl.M.A.No. 18395/2011 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Cri.M.C. 3903/2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 16411991 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Malviya Nagar on the complaint of the respondent No.2 on the ground of parties having amicably settled the dispute. Petitioners as well as the respondent No. 2 are identified by their respective counsels. Respondent No. 2/complainant Geeta was married to "" I,, ! I Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. - petitioner No. I Mahesh Kumar. Now, the parties have got decree of divorce by mutual consent vide order dated 12th August, 2011 of Principal Judge, Saket Courts. In terms of the settlement arrived at Mediation Cell, Tis Hazari Courts on Oih November, 2011, a total sum ofRs. 6,25,000/- was to be paid to the respondent No. 2 towards her entire claim and rights, out of which, Rs. 3,50,000/- has already been paid to her and balance Rs. 2, 75,000/- is paid today by way of bankers cheque, receipt of which she admits. Respondent No. 2 states that she has compromised the matter with the petitioners of her own free will and volition and without any pressure or coercion and now, she is left with no grievance against the petitioners and she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No. 164/1991 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Malviya Nagar and all the consequential proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. Bail bonds of the petitioners are cancelled and their sureties are discharged. The petition stands disposed of. NOVEMBER 25, 2011 akb - M.L. MEHTA,J

Case details

Parties and counsel

---{ -,oC' '";:- QJ * IN THE IDGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELID + CRL.M.C. 3903/2011 0/o MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: versus ..... Petitioner Petitioners in person with Mr. Rajesh Kajla, Advocate. STATE NCT OF DELID & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP. CORAM: Respondent No. 2 in person with Mr.Narender Vashishta, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.