- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2016
- Bench
- Sunil Gaur
- Case no.
- MAC.APP. 552/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
10.11.2016 Learned counsel for appellant submits that the relief sought in this appeal is already claimed in MAC.APP. 551/2016 and due to objection of the Registry, separate appeal was filed seeking setting aside of impugned Award of 7th May, 2016 vide which entire compensation amount has been awarded to respondent No.1-husband while denying it to appellants, who are parents of the deceased. In the light of aforesaid, learned counsel for appellants does not press this appeal with permission to assail the grant of compensation to respondent No.1-husband in MAC.APP. 551/2016. This appeal and application are accordingly disposed of as not pressed, with liberty as aforesaid. SUNIL GAUR, J NOVEMBER 10, 2016 r
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 552/2016 & C.M.No. 26224/2016 MAHA RANI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Kaushal Sachdev & Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocates Versus JITENDER & ORS. (SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.