- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 28 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1627/2011
Judgment
ORDER
28.L1.2011 % . By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of underSections323l34|l324B26l34IPCregisteredatPS FIR No. 43412011 Jamia Nagar, Delhi o(b onthe complaint of llespondentNo' 2' RespondentNo.2WaseemAhmedwhoreceivedgrievousinjuries and Respondent No. 3 Fardeen who received simpre injuries are present in Courtandareidentifiedbythelnvestigatingofficer.Theystatethatthe matter has beE"n settled between the parties as they are neighbours' In this regardaMemorandumofUnderstandinghasbeenannexedasAnnexure-P-Z atpage25ofthepresentpetition.Theyfuitherstatethatinviewofthe settletnent between the pafties' they do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto' W.P'GRL) 1627/2011 Puge 1 of 2 gned By:AMULYA the digital file and e have been compared and data is as per the physical page is missing. ure Not Verified q-/ Lcarned counsel for the State also points out that the statement of Tanveer, brother of Respondent No. 2 has also been recorded, according to which he was also beaten and his clothes were torn. It rnay be noted that there is no MLC of the said'fanveer showing that he is an injured person. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own fiee will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pulpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further. acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 43412011 under Sections 323/34I/324/326134 IPC registered at PS Jamia Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their O staternents made before this Court. t l^. \f The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 28,20ll/'vn' w.P.(cRL) r627/2011 \ . tld^_r*tf It.; -, d \ ,t ,/ Pz}-"* u{4 M,ry ry F\ 'a^i => -Mff,r> flt,"Xrt.#rfL " MUKTA GUPTA, J. (#knnr:: -Z 2-2?ko4nva (Ffl;"1 /"4r,r ,) E "2t4 t-, 2-'n'{ "s fona )lf^
Case details
Parties and counsel
7s#$-rN Tr{E HrcH couRT oF + w.p.(cnr-) t627l2orr ' MoI-iD AMIR & oRs , 'Ihrough: DELI{I AT NEW DELIII ..... Petitioners Mr. F. Haq and Mr' Momin Fazal' A'a"""*tt *ittt p"titioners in person' ..... ResPondents VEISUS STATE & ORS Through: Mr' Harsh Prabhakar' Advocate for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate with SI Satisn fumar' PS Jamia Nagar' n"'Po"a"ntNos' 2 and3 in Person' t fr8$#; M* rusrlcE MuKrtGuPrA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.