VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Satish Kumar Behl and Anr v. Mcd and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 November 2011
Bench
Sunil Gaurauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 8321/2011

Judgment

ORDER 2s.tl.20tl

¶1What is impugned in this petition is the Vacation Notice of

18.11.2011 (Annexure P-9). The grievance of petitioners is that it is not preoeded by any demolition order or like.

¶2Learned counsel for petitioners' states that the petitioners are senior citizens and they were shocked to see the impugned Vacation Notice {Annexure P-9) pasted outside their premises and vide communication of

23.II.20II (Annexure P-10), they had made grievance to the respondents about non receipt of any demolition order, but in vain.

¶3Notice.

¶4Ms. Mini Pushkaran, Advocate, accepts notice of the petition on o/o WP.(C) No.8321/2011 Page 1 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. tF - "L behalf of respondents and states that without going into the aspect of Demolition Order bging served, the Demolition Order qua the petitioners would be made available to the leamed counsel for the petitioners within 3 days.

¶5Learned counsel for petitioners states that upon receipt of the aforesaid Demolition Order, petitioners would be approaching the concemed Tribunal for the relief sought herein.

¶6In the light of the aforesaid, let certified copy of Demolition Order be made available to the petitioners' counsel within 3 days, who seeks a week's time to approach the Tribunal concerned. Purely as an interim measure, let no coercive step be taken against the petitioners in this matter for a period of 10 days' to enable them to approach the Tribunal concerned.

¶7With directions as aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.

¶8Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master to counsel representing both sides. NOVEMBER 25,2011 ^l -rs .:X NIL GAUR, J W.P.(C) No.B321/2011 Page2

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-38 *IN + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(c) 8321/2011 SATISH KIIMAR BEHL AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Bahal, Advocate VETSUS MCD & ORS. Throush: ..... Respondents Ms. Mini Pushkaran & Ms. Prerna Verma. Advocates. a CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.