VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2008 › High Court of Delhi

Sandeep & Ors v. State & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
20 March 2008
Bench
Rekha Sharmaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3909/2007

Judgment

ORDER

20.03.2008 On the complaint of respondent No.2, Surinder Singh, FIR No.420/2007 under Sections 342/506/323/34 IPC read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act was registered at Police Station Narela against petitioners No.1 to 5. After investigation charge sheet was filed and proceedings thereto are pending in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Ms. Smita Garg at Rohini Courts. In the meanwhile, parties have arrived at a settlement. The terms of settlement are contained in the compromise deed which is at page 26 of the paper book. In view of the settlement, the petitioners have filed the present petition for quashing of the FIR registered against them and the proceedings arising therefrom, to which respondent No.2, who is present in the Court has no objection. _5 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. , r ' Having regard to the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that no useful purpose will be served in allowing the proceedings pending before the aforesaid Metropolitan Magistrate to continue. Accordingly, I quash FIR No.420/2007 under Sections 342/506/323/34 IPC read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act registered at Police Station Narela and also the proceedings emanating therefrom subject·to each of the petitioners depositing Rs.5,000/- as cost with the Welfare Fund within four weeks. Dasti. MARCH 20, 2008 s.pal

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3909/2007 0/o SANDEEP & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Rana, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. CORAM: ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Santosh Kohli, Addi.Standing Counsel for the State. HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.