Manoj Gaur v. Neeta Vohra

ORDER

29.10.2010 Counsel for the respondent states that evidence of all the witnesses has already been recorded before the trial court and the matter is listed on 10.11.2010 for final arguments. In this view of the matter, counsel for the petitioner seeks leave 10 to withdraw the present petition while reserving his right to seek his remedies after passing of the impugned judgment. Leave, as prayed, for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. HIMA KOHLI,J OCTOBER 29, 2010 rkb Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

17. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 588/2009 MANOJ GAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Advocate with Mr. Nihal Ahmed and Ms. Sweta Rani, Advocates versus NEETAVOHRA Respondent Through: Mr. Kishore M. Gajoria, Advocate • with Mr. Rajesh Chugh and Mr. Piyush Sachdeva, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI