- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2016
- Bench
- Vibhu Bakhru
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 291/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2016
¶1Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the arbitration proceedings are almost over inasmuch as the hearings are concluded and the Arbitrator has also called upon the petitioner to furnish stamp duty for publishing the award.
¶2He further submits that the respondent had advanced a sum of Rs. 9,39,00,000/- to respondent No.1 on 19.06.2015 and the said loan was secured by the deposit of the original title deeds of the property bearing No. 3/26, Second Floor, Shanti Niketan, New Delhi (hereafter 'the said propoerty'). He further states that the petitioner's interest in the said property is also subject matter of proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal. This is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents.
¶3The petitioner was constrained to approach this court as the petitioner apprehended that the respondent would alienate the said property, which would prejudice the petitioner.
¶4In view of the submissions that the petitioner's interest in the said
property is subject matter of arbitral proceedings and that the arbitral proceedings are almost over, the interim order passed on 15.7.2016 is made absolute till the publishing of the award.
¶5The petition is disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 07, 2016 pkv
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 291/2016 HERO FINCORP LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Arjun Sawhney, Advocate. versus AJAY MAINI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms Misha Rohatgi Mohta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.