Arun Bansal v. Chetan V Sanghi & Ors

ORDER %

28.11.2011 The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the order dated

29.11.2010 passed in W.P.(C.) No. 3853/2010, whereby the Court had directed that the allotment of the petitioner's plot shall not be cancelled on account of the construction over the plot in question not having been raised as ye7 the respondents have issued final notice regarding non-construction on 03.11.2011. Learned counsel for the respondents, who puts appearance on advance communication, submits that this notice has been issued inadvertently. In view of the aforesaid position, this petition does not survive. It is, accordingly, disposed of. Let the proper intimation be issued to the petitioner regarding the withdrawal of the notice. VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 28, 2011 'BSR' :- Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

46. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 866/2011 & C.M. Nos. 21480-81/2011 ARUN BANSAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with Mr. Vaibhav Jairaj, Advocates. versus CHETAN V SANGHI & ORS Through: CORAM: ..... Respondents Ms. Renuka Arora, Advocate for the respondent -OS II DC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI