Uma Rani v. Renu Babbar & Anr

ORDER %

22.12.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No 266/1997 under Section 406, 498-A IPG registered at P.S. Sarojini Nagar on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. FIR was registered on the complaint of the respondent No. 1 who was married with Mukesh, son of the petitioner. Mukesh has since expired. Both the parties are present in person and are identified by their respective counsels. The respondent No. 1, who is the complainant and the petitioner state that they have compromised the matter and now there is no dispute left. Respondent No. 1 states that she has compromised the matter with the petitioners out of her own free will and volition and without any pressure or coercion of any sort and now, she is left with no grievance against the petitioners and she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably resolved Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. all their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No 266/1997 under Section 406, 498-A IPC registered at P.S. SarojiniNagar and all the consequentialproceedings arising therefrom are herby quashed. Bail bonds of the petitioners are cancelled and their sureties are discharged. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. m M.L. MEHT^ DECEMBER 22, 2011 awanish

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4184/2011 UMA RANI Petitioner Through: Ms Sonia Arora, Adv. versus RENU BABBAR & ANR. Respondent Through: Mr. Kailash Pandey, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA