- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2017
- Bench
- Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 362/2016
Judgment
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. NOVEMBER 15, 2017 "bs".. (Corrected & released on 30th January, 2018)
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 15th November, 2017. + RC.REV.68/2015 & CM No.2539/2015 (for stay) RAVINDER JEET SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LR ..…..Petitioner Through: Mr. Padamkant Saxena, Adv. Versus KANTA VADHERA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rahul Shukla, Adv. AND + RC.REV.69/2015 & CM No.2541/2015 (for stay) RAVINDER JEET SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LR ..…..Petitioner Through: Mr. Padamkant Saxena, Adv. Versus KANTA VADHERA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rahul Shukla, Adv. AND + RC.REV.362/2016 & CM No.26116/2016 (for stay) AMIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand, Adv. Versus KANTA VADHERA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rahul Shukla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW 1. These Rent Control Revision Petitions, all under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, by three tenants of the respondents/landlords, impugn the orders of dismissal of the applications filed by the petitioners/tenants for leave to defend the petitions for eviction filed by the respondents/landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act for eviction of the petitioners from the shops in their tenancy under the respondents/landlords. 2. RC.REV. No.68/2015 and RC.REV. No.69/2015 impugn the orders both dated 14th October, 2014 in E-485/14/13 and E-485/14/13, both of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC) (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner therein from shop No.2296-B and shop No.2296-C respectively, at Chatta Punjabian, Bahadurgarh Road, Delhi-110006. 3. RC.REV. No.362/2016 impugns the order, also dated 14th October, 2014 in E-489/14/13, also of the Court of ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner therein from shop No.2298-B, Chatta Punjabian, Bahadurgarh Road, Delhi-110006. 4. The petitions were entertained and notice thereof ordered to be issued and subject to the petitioners in RC.REV. Nos.68/2015 & 69/2015 paying user charges to the respondents/landlords @ Rs.9,000/- per month and Rs.7,000/- per month respectively, from the date of the eviction order, the eviction of the petitioners/tenants therein stayed during the pendency of those petitions. However, in RC.REV. No.362/2016, the execution of the order of eviction of the petitioner/tenant therein was stayed without providing for payment of any user charges. 5. While RC.REV. Nos.68/2015 & 69/2015 have always been taken up together, on RC.REV. No.362/2016 being filed, though belatedly, all the three petitions are being listed together. 6. The counsel for the petitioner/tenant in RC.REV. Nos.68/2015 & 69/2015 and the counsel for the petitioner/tenant in RC.REV.No.362/2016 and the senior counsel for the respondents/landlords in all the three petitions have been heard. 7. The respondents/landlords filed petitions for eviction with respect to all the three shops subject matter of the three petitions on the same facts and which are as under: (i) that the tenant in Shops No.2296-B and 2296-C (subject matter of RCR No.68/2015 and RCR No.69/2015) as well as the tenant in Shop No.2298-B (subject matter of RCR No.362/2016) are old tenants, with the rent of the shop subject matter of RC.REV. No.68/2015 being Rs.20/- per month, rent of shop subject matter of RC.REV. No.69/2015 being Rs.30/- per month and the rent of shop subject matter of RC.REV. No.362/2016 also being Rs.20/- per month; (ii) that the shops subject matter of RC.REV. Nos.68/2015 & 69/2015 are without any electricity connection and are used by the petitioner/tenant for dumping waste and useless articles; the petitioner/tenant therein is otherwise carrying on his business from shop No.2308-09, 2217-B, Teliwara, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-06 and has employed more than 20 employees in the said premises; that though shop subject matter of RC.REV. No.362/2016 has an electricity
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.