Ramesh Kumar v. State

- 47t % 03.r2.20ro Present: Mr. Sachin Sachdeva, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr. Ranjit Kapur, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Anand Swaroop, P.S. Connaught Place. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. lCrl.l No. 1781/2O10 Petitioner was granted parole for 10 days on medical ground by a Single Judge of this Court vide order dated 16tt' September, 2OlO passed in W.P. (Crl.) No. 289 l2OIO, subsequently, parole period was extended by another 15 days vide order dated 9th November, 2OIO passed in Crl. M.C. No. 348312010, parole period was again extended by another 10 days vide order dated 24th November, 2OIO passed in Crl. M.C. No. 3654 /2oIO. By way of the present writ petition, petitioner has again approached this Court seeking further extension of time of parole by another two months. It is submitted that petitioner has to be operated on 27*' December, 2OLO. Perusal of ,. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. )/ relevant medical papers shows that the date of operation has been fixed on request of the petitioner. If the condition of petitioner is so critical he could have been operated during the last one month, during which period he was on parole. Prior to his release petitioner had been receiving medical treatment in the jail hospital, inasmuch as he was also treated in AIIMS. I do not find any justification to extend the parole period of the petitioner any further. Petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent on expiry of parole period. However, while in jail he shall be.provided further medical treatment and-if need be he may be taken to AIIMS by the jail authorities, for his treatment. This writ petition is dismissed. A copy of the order be sent to Superintendent Jail. DECEMBER 03, ?OLO rb ,'. Fuvien fJfr'* f*1, j". rzr^y , a,bve ww g^ N {h"re-t 1^1et'L4 0-?l\