Raj Kumari v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

ORDER %

10.11.2016

¶1The petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.228/2016 under Sections 341/354B/326B/109/34 IPG registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar. Status report is on record.

¶2I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 27.07.2016, the petitioners were BAIL APPLN. 1500/2016 n granted interim protection and were directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioners have since joined the investigation.

¶3It is informed that the bail applications filed by other two accused persons i.e.Rajesh and Sushil were withdrawn by them. Status report reveals that both of them subsequently suiTcndeied and were arrested. It is informed that they have since been admitted to bail by the court below.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the role assigned to them, the petitioners are admitted to anticipatory bail and in the event of their arrest, they be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond in the sum of ^40,000/- each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the-SHO/lnvestigating Officer with the condition that they shall join the investigation as and when required.

¶5The bail applications stand disposed of. S^ARG, J. NOVEMBER 10, 2016 /sa BAIL APPLN. 1500/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1500/2016 REENA n . Petitioner Through : Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NOT DEEHI) ..... Respondent Through ; Mr.Arun Kr. Sharma, APP. W/SI Rakhi, PS Bharat Nagar. + BAIL APPLN. 1501/2016 RAJKUMARI .....Petitioner Through : .Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus n STATE (GOVT OF NOT OF DEEHI) Respondent Through ; Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP. W/SI Rakhi, PS Bharat Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG