VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Kamla & Ors v. State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
9 November 2016
Bench
S.P.Gargauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 1474/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

09.11.2016

¶1The petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.332/2016 registered under Sections 308/34 IPC at PS Sagar Pur. Status report is on record.

¶2I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the record. By an order dated

25.07.2016, the petitioners were granted interim protection and were directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioners have joined the investigation since then.

¶3The petitioners are close relatives of the victim. Victim's husband against whom there are serious allegations is in custody and his bail application has been dismissed as withdrawn today itself. BAIL APPLN. 1474/2016

¶4The occurrence took place on 02.06.2016. The FIR was lodged after a delay of around forty days. Allegations against the petitioners and victim's husband are that they threw her from the third floor at about 05.15 a.m. because of a domestic quarrel. The victim has implicated all her relatives i.e. mother-in-law (Kamla Devi), Prem Devi (Chachiya Sas), sister-in-law (Rukma) and brother-in-law (Rahul) without specifying any overt act individually to them.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, they be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. They shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

¶6The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J. NOVEMBER 09, 2016 /tr BAIL APPLN. 1474/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1474/2016 KAMLA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Kuldeep Rana, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. Mr.Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate with Mr.Yogendra Verma, Advocate for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.