Abdul Aleem @ Raju v. The State

,/ .; .• .. C,, / .· .. ·i ('· Item No.39

09.11.2012 Present: Mr. R.D. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State. SI Udaipal Singh, P.S. Sadar Bazar. + Crl. M.A. No.18783/2012 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to the deficiency being rectified. The application stands disposed of. +Bail Application No.1619/2012 This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking extension of the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner on 24.4.2012. It is contended by the learned counsel that vide aforesaid order, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail for a period of six months on the assurance given by the learned counsel for the State that the charge-sheet will be filed within a period of three months; however, till date, the charge-sheet has not been filed. It is, accordingly, contended that as the charge-sheet has not been filed, therefore, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner may be extended. Issue notice. Mr. Sunil Sharma, the learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. 1-- The learned counsel for the State makes a statement at bar, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, that the charge-sheet is ready and the same shall be filed latest by tomorrow. Having regard to the statement made by the learned counsel for the State, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner is extended by two weeks, __ a.l._ which period shall reckon from today. The application stands disposed of. NOVEMBER 09, 2012 'AA' p.v

V.K. SHALl, J.